FILES



Do trauma-informed school practices lead to improved mental health and academic outcomes in children?

M&E | Track Resource Download

SHARE

Do trauma-informed school practices lead to improved mental health and academic outcomes in children?

Strong evidence indicates that trauma-informed school practices hold significant promise for enhancing children’s well-being and academic success.

Research on trauma-informed school practices has expanded greatly in the past five years, with the publication of 15 systematic reviews included in this summary. Eleven of these reviews found positive outcomes, including reduced trauma symptoms, better behavior, and academic gains. Educators also reported increased self-confidence in their ability to manage challenging behaviors, as well as improved school climate. While many studies used research designs that produce moderate or suggestive evidence, all reviews supported continued implementation and evaluation.

Empirical support is strongest for clinical interventions targeted toward students at risk or with intensive needs.

Individual and group interventions targeted for students at risk and those with intensive needs consistently reduced post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and improved resilience. These interventions were often based in cognitive-behavioral therapy and delivered by mental health professionals. These approaches are supported by the most rigorous research.

Classroom-level interventions are supported by moderate evidence from pilot studies or qualitative research.

Teachers’ classroom strategies, such as relationship-building and trauma-sensitive discipline, showed positive effects on classroom dynamics and teacher engagement. However, most studies lacked strong experimental designs.

Whole-school interventions show promise but have a weaker empirical base with limited use of randomized controlled trials.

School-wide models show promise for improving school climate, student behavior, and staff capacity, but the evidence is limited by small sample sizes and weak methodologies. More robust studies are needed to confirm effectiveness.

Post TitleStrength of EvidenceType of StudyDirection of Evidence
Localising public health: Refugee-led organisations as first and last responders in COVID-19No evidence about impactSuggestive evidenceNo evidence about impact
Project prepared: Building community through disaster preparedness in San Jose’s Japantown and Hensley Historic DistrictNo evidence about impactSuggestive evidenceNo evidence about impact
Reaching invisible and unprotected workers on farms during the coronavirus pandemicPositive impactSuggestive evidencePositive impact
Considerations for COVID-19 management in reception centers for refugees, asylum seekers, and migrants, Spain 2020No evidence about impactSuggestive evidenceNo evidence about impact
Leveraging interactive voice response technology to mitigate COVID-19 risk in refugee settlements in Uganda: Lessons learned implementing “Dial COVID” a toll-free mobile phone symptom surveillance and information dissemination toolPositive impactSuggestive evidencePositive impact
Considerations about engaging volunteers in crisis managementsNo evidence about impactSuggestive evidenceNo evidence about impact
Factors related to immigrants’ disaster preparedness: A scoping reviewNo evidence about impactSystematic reviewNo evidence about impact
The role of first-line managers in a pandemic in reducing the spread of infections and promoting the health and well-being of Rohingya refugeesNo evidence about impactSuggestive evidenceNo evidence about impact
Emergency preparedness: Knowledge and perceptions of Latin American immigrantsNo evidence about impactSuggestive evidenceNo evidence about impact
Promoting Community Preparedness and Resilience: A Latino Immigrant Community-Driven Project Following Hurricane Sandy.Positive impactSuggestive evidencePositive impact
Developing a disaster preparedness campaign targeting low-income Latino immigrants: focus group results for project PREP.No evidence about impactSuggestive evidenceNo evidence about impact
Medical interpreters and bilingual school staff: potential disaster information conduits?No evidence about impactSuggestive evidenceNo evidence about impact
Responding to a Mumps Outbreak Impacting Immigrants and Low-English-Proficiency Populations.Positive impactSuggestive evidencePositive impact
Global learning experiences during a domestic community health clinical.No evidence about impactSuggestive evidenceNo evidence about impact
Young people from refugee backgrounds as a resource for disaster risk reductionNo evidence about impactSuggestive evidenceNo evidence about impact
Pandemic influenza preparedness and response among immigrants and refugees.No evidence about impactSuggestive evidenceNo evidence about impact
Integrating Immigrant Families in Emergency Response, Relief and Rebuilding EffortsPositive impactSuggestive evidencePositive impact
A Bosnian Refugee Community’s Hidden Capacity in Preparation for a Natural Disaster in the United StatesNo evidence about impactSuggestive evidenceNo evidence about impact
Adaptation of a community health outreach model during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of the Mexican consulates in the United States of AmericaPositive impactSuggestive evidencePositive impact
Refugee-led organizations’ crisis response during the COVID-19 pandemicNo evidence about impactSuggestive evidenceNo evidence about impact
Brokering resources during a pandemic: Exploring how organizations and clinics responded to the needs of immigrant communities during COVID-19No evidence about impactSuggestive evidenceNo evidence about impact
Pandemic Influenza Preparedness and Response Among Immigrants and RefugeesSuggestiveSuggestive evidenceNo evidence about impact
Integrating Immigrant Families in Emergency Response, Relief, and Rebuilding EffortsSuggestiveSuggestive evidencePositive impact
Emergency Preparedness: Knowledge and Perceptions of Latin American ImmigrantsSuggestiveSuggestive evidenceNo evidence about impact
Promoting Community Preparedness and Resilience: A Latino Immigrant Community-Driven Project Following Hurricane SandySuggestiveSuggestive evidencePositive impact
Developing a Disaster Preparedness Campaign Targeting Low-Income Latino Immigrants: Focus Group Results for Project PREPSuggestiveSuggestive evidenceNo evidence about impact
Medical Interpreters and Bilingual School Staff: Potential Disaster Information Conduits?SuggestiveSuggestive evidenceNo evidence about impact
Responding to a Mumps Outbreak Impacting Immigrants and Low-English-Proficiency PopulationsSuggestiveSuggestive evidencePositive impact
Global Learning Experiences During a Domestic Community Health ClinicalSuggestiveSuggestive evidenceNo evidence about impact
Young People from Refugee Backgrounds as a Resource for Disaster Risk ReductionSuggestiveSuggestive evidenceNo evidence about impact

Studies included in the database focused on high-income or upper middle-income countries, including but not limited to the United States. Studies included must have been published since 2000. To identify evidence related to emergency preparedness among refugees, we searched the following websites and databases using the following population, methodology, and target problem terms:

Websites and Databases Population Terms Methodology Terms Target Problem Terms
Campbell Collaboration
Cochrane Collaboration
Mathematica Policy Research
Evidence Aid
Urban Institute
Migration Policy Institute
HHS OPRE
Medline
ASSIA
Social Services Abstracts
Social Work Abstracts
ReliefWeb
ALNAP
refugee
OR
immigrant
OR
“unaccompanied minor”
OR
asylee
OR
“temporary protected status”
OR
“victims of traffick*”
OR
“traffick*victims”
OR
T-Visa
OR
U-Visa
OR
Cuban
OR
Haitian
OR
Amerasian
evaluation
OR
impact
OR
program
OR
intervention
OR
policy
OR Project
OR
train*
OR
therapy
OR
treatment
OR
counseling
OR
workshop
OR
review
OR
meta-analysis
OR
synthesis
“disaster prepared*”
OR
“emergency prepared*”
OR
pandemic

For databases or websites that permitted only basic searches, free-text terms and limited term combinations were selected out of the lists above, and all resultant studies were reviewed for relevance. Conversely, for databases or websites with advanced search capability, we made use of relevant filters available. All search terms were searched in the title and abstract fields only in order to exclude studies that made only passing mention of the topic under consideration.

After initial screening, Switchboard evidence mapping is prioritized as follows:First priority is given to meta-analyses and systematic reviews, followed by individual impact evaluations when no meta-analyses or systematic reviews are available. Evaluations that are rated as impact evidence are considered before those rated as suggestive, with the latter only being included for outcomes where no evidence is available from the former. As noted earlier, for the present topic of refugee emergency preparedness, no meta-analyses, systematic reviews, or impact evaluations were available; thus,suggestive studies were included