FILES



Evidence Summary - What Works to Support Newcomers With Disabilities and Chronic Illnesses?

M&E | Track Resource Download

   

SHARE

What Works to Support Newcomers With Disabilities and Chronic Illnesses?

This research summary describes the state of available evidence regarding the impacts of interventions with newcomers with a disability or chronic illness.

The summary highlights that cultural adaptations and connections can significantly benefit newcomers with chronic illnesses by improving self-efficacy, health knowledge, and access to healthcare. Studies on community health navigators and cultural case workers show positive impacts on immigrants with chronic conditions, leading to enhanced quality of life, fewer symptoms, and greater knowledge of their conditions. Culturally adapted interventions have been notably successful among Korean-Americans with chronic diseases, emphasizing social inclusion. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding non-health-related interventions for newcomers with disabilities, particularly in areas like social services, housing, and employment.

Post TitleStrength of EvidenceType of StudyDirection of Evidence
Supporting human trafficking survivor resiliency through comprehensive case managementSuggestiveSuggestive evidenceN/A
Bringing refugees from crisis to flourishing: The role of resettlement agencies and the church in facilitating integration and stabilitySuggestiveSuggestive evidenceN/A
Defining effective care coordination for mental health referrals of refugee populations in the United StatesSuggestiveSuggestive evidenceN/A
Meeting complex needs through community collaboration: A case studyInconclusive or mixed impactSuggestive evidenceInconclusive or mixed impact
Integrated behavioral health care for Karen refugees: a qualitative exploration of active ingredientsSuggestiveSuggestive evidencePositive impact
Outcomes for Youth Served by the Unaccompanied Refugee Minor Foster Care Program: A Pilot StudySuggestiveSuggestive evidenceInconclusive or mixed impact
Culturally congruent intensive case management service for three refugee communitiesSuggestiveSuggestive evidenceInconclusive or mixed impact
Connecting refugees to substance use treatment: a qualitative studySuggestiveSuggestive evidencePositive impact
Intensive psychotherapy and case management for Karen refugees with major depression in primary care: a pragmatic randomized control trialModerateImpact evaluationPositive impact
Defining effective care coordination for mental health referrals of refugee populations in the united statesSuggestiveSuggestive evidencePositive impact
A systematic review of social service programs serving refugeesStrongSystematic reviewInconclusive or mixed impact
Findings from an extended case management US refugee resettlement programSuggestiveSuggestive evidencePositive impact
Healthcare access for Iraqi refugee children in Texas: persistent barriers, potential solutions, and policy implicationsSuggestiveSuggestive evidencePositive impact

Studies included in the database focused on high-income or upper middle-income countries, including but not limited to the United States. Studies included must have been published since 2012. To identify evidence related to case management with refugees, we searched the following websites and databases using the following population, methodology, and target intervention terms:

Websites and Databases Population Terms Methodology Terms Target Problem Terms
Campbell Collaboration
Cochrane Collaboration
Mathematica Policy Research
Urban Institute
Migration Policy Institute
CINAHL
ASSIA
Social Services Abstracts
Social Work Abstracts
PsycInfo
ERIC
refugee
OR
immigrant
OR
“unaccompanied minor”
OR
asylee
OR
“temporary protected status”
OR
“victims of traffick*”
OR
“traffick* victims”
OR
T-Visa
OR
U-Visa
OR
Cuban
OR
Haitian
OR
Amerasian
evaluation
OR
impact
OR
program
OR
intervention
OR
policy
OR
project
OR
train*
OR
therapy
OR
treatment
OR
counseling
OR
workshop
OR
review
OR
meta-analysis
OR
synthesis
“case manage*”