Evidence-based volunteer management: A review of the literature

Year Published:

Abstract

This article reviews 81 articles that directly tested the effectiveness of volunteer management practices. Many articles measured volunteers’ perceptions of the quality of management practices, not the practices themselves, making their utility to volunteer managers limited. Most articles used self-reported, cross-sectional surveys and subjective outcome measures such as satisfaction and intent to continue volunteering. Despite these limitations, current research supports the effectiveness of 11 best practices: liability insurance, clearly defined roles, job design, recruitment strategies, screening and matching, orientation and training, supervision and communication, recognition, satisfying motivations, reflection and peer support. No support has yet been found for three supposed best practices suggested by the practitioner literature: written policies, recordkeeping and individual evaluations. Future studies should use more rigorous methods, including validated measures, external ratings of volunteer effectiveness, field experiments and longitudinal surveys.

Citation

Relevant Evidence Summaries

The evidence was reviewed and included in the following summaries: 

What factors impact volunteer recruitment and retention in nonprofit organizations?

This document summarizes the state of available evidence regarding what factors impact nonprofit organizations’ ability to recruit and retain volunteers. It aims to answer the following questions: What practices can managers implement to improve volunteer recruitment and retention in their organization? What are the gaps in the current research on volunteer recruitment and retention?  

About this study

DIRECTION OF EVIDENCE: Inconclusive or mixed impact

FULL TEXT AVAILABILITY: Paid

HOST COUNTRY: Multiple countries

POPULATION: Other

STRENGTH OF EVIDENCE: Inconclusive or mixed impact

TYPE OF STUDY: Systematic review

YEAR PUBLISHED: 2018

More STUDIES