FILES



Evidence Summary

M&E | Track Resource Download
   Employment

SHARE

What strategies improve the outcomes of refugee women in employment programs?

This evidence summary, authored by Switchboard, summarizes the state of available evidence regarding strategies to improve the employment rates of refugee women in employment programs.

Limited but growing evidence shows positive impacts of national policies on the employment rates of refugees.

Canada’s Educational Credential Assessment requirement for economic migrants and private sponsorship programs has shown positive impacts on employment rates, the latter especially for women with lower educational levels.

Denmark’s 2016 work-first policy for refugees had a significant positive impact on men’s employment rates one year after arrival, but the impact on women appeared to be limited and potentially negative.

Systematic reviews identified no robust studies for refugees specifically and limited evidence for low-income populations.

A 2015 comprehensive systematic review of the effects of interventions on refugees’ labor force participation rate, employment rate, use of cash assistance, income, job retention, and quality of life identified no studies for inclusion due to methodological weaknesses. Consequently, the review, which included programs serving both women and men, did not find any evidence for or against any intervention.

Several interventions have been found to be effective at improving labor market outcomes of low-income adults in general. The strategies that appear most effective are financial incentives and sanctions, education, work experience, and training. Interventions that combine several strategies to help low-income workers find and keep jobs appear more effective than any single strategy.

Largely suggestive evidence provides some guidance on what could work for refugee women entering the labor market.

Extended case management is associated with higher household incomes and job satisfaction, in addition to significantly higher employment rates at six months and one year post-resettlement. However, benefits for women are not as clear as those for men.

Supporting women in developing skills and meeting educational attainment goals can lead to higher employment rates.

Opening opportunities for women to engage in the workforce in non-traditional ways, such as through entrepreneurship or gig work, could help overcome potential barriers surrounding traditional workplaces.

Post TitleStrength of EvidenceType of StudyDirection of Evidence
Implementing a psychosocial support group in U.S. refugee resettlementSuggestiveSuggestive evidencePositive impact
Social-capital-based mental health interventions for refugees: A systematic reviewStrongSystematic reviewPositive impact
A scoping review of social support interventions with refugees in resettlement contexts: Implications for practice an applied researchStrongSystematic reviewPositive impact
Effectiveness of a peer-based intervention on loneliness and social isolation of older Chinese immigrants in Canada: A randomized controlled trialModerateImpact evaluationPositive impact
Fostering resilience and belongingness among students with refugee backgroundsSuggestiveSuggestive evidenceN/A
A randomized control trial to test peer support group approach for reducing social isolation and depression among female Mexican immigrantsSuggestiveSuggestive evidenceN/A
A community-based intervention to enhance posttraumatic growth among refugees in receiving societiesSuggestiveSuggestive evidenceN/A
Peer support groups and peer mentoring in refugee adolescents and young adults: A literature reviewSuggestiveSuggestive evidencePositive impact
How effective is group intervention in the treatment for unaccompanied and accompanied refugee minors with mental health difficulties: A systematic reviewStrongSystematic reviewPositive impact
Intimate partner violence prevention and intervention group-format programs for immigrant Latinas: A systematic reviewStrongSystematic reviewPositive impact

Studies included in the database focused on high-income or upper middle-income countries, including but not limited to the United States. Studies included must have been published since 2000. To identify evidence related to peer support groups among refugees, we searched the following websites and databases using the following population, methodology, and target intervention terms:

Websites and Databases Population Terms Methodology Terms Target Intervention Terms
Campbell Collaboration
Cochrane Collaboration
Mathematica Policy Research
Evidence Aid
Urban Institute
Migration Policy Institute
HHS OPRE
Medline ASSIA
Social Services Abstracts
Social Work Abstracts
ReliefWeb
ALNAP
refugeeOR
“unaccompanied minor”
OR
asylee
OR
“temporary protected status”
OR
“victims of traffick*”
OR
“traffick* victims”
ORT
-Visa
OR
U-Visa
OR
Cuban
OR
Haitian
OR
Amerasian
evaluation
OR
impact
OR
program
OR
intervention
OR
policy
OR
project
OR
therapy
OR
treatment
OR
counseling
OR
workshop
OR
review
OR
meta-analysis
OR
synthesis
“support group”

For databases or websites that permitted only basic searches, free-text terms and limited term combinations were selected out of the lists above, and all resultant studies were reviewed for relevance. Conversely, for databases or websites with advanced search capability, we made use of relevant filters available. All search terms were searched in the title and abstract fields only in order to exclude studies that made only passing mention of the topic under consideration. After initial screening, Switchboard evidence mapping is prioritized as follows: First priority is given to meta-analyses and systematic reviews, followed by individual impact evaluations when no meta-analyses or systematic reviews are available. Evaluations that are rated as impact evidence are considered before those rated as suggestive, with the latter only being included for outcomes where no evidence is available from the former.